Ron Paul Emerges On Top At Republican Debates

Ron Paul (R-Texas) running for the Republican nomination for Presidential race of 2008 won the MSNBC debate and now also the Fox News Debate.

Every online Poll even at hardcore NeoCon supporter sites like World News Daily had down as a winner.

However, Fox News did not like these results and lied that the viewers skewed the polls:

This is so much like Fox News – they report the wrong news and they tell outright lies. There was a poll done some years back that showed that people who watch Fox get everything wrong.

There’s a reason why they call it Fox News. In the English language, the word fox is also used to mean to swindle, trick, deceive, etc.

Ron Paul won both debates hands down and there’s no doubt about it. The polls on MSNBC and Fox News proves it. Fox wanted Giuliani to win and the whole debate was rigged. Fortunately, the viewers were smarter and realize Ron Paul represents their views. Giuliani sounded the stupidest. He made John “Bomb Iran” McCain look good.

Tom Tancredo on a radio show when asked a hypothetical question about what he would do if al-Qaeda launched an attack with a nuclear bomb, said he would “take out” Muslim holy sites including Mecca specifically if “Islamic terrorists” launched such an attack.

During the Tuesday night’s debate he said that “the root cause of Islamic terrorism is a dictate of their religion.” Never mind the fact that Christianity has more hands than any other religion in the history of this world. Let me tell you – I really believe that Jesus Christ (Peace be upon him) would be horrified. We bomb nations, send troops to kill and steal their resources in His name. No way would Jesus condone the mass murder today that this administration is committing in His name.

And what’s with these people? Don’t they read anything? The 9/11 Commission report clearly outlined the reasons for Islamic terrorist attacks, including unfavorable US policies in the Middle East. Even Bin Laden’s fatwa against the West states his reasons as Iraq, American support for Israel and American troops in Saudi Arabia to launch attacks against the US. This was in the 90’s.

There have been many books written about “blowback”, it is taught in every Political Science school – My favorite book on the subject was by Chalmers Johnson who wrote two other bestsellers that I have yet to read:

Books by Chalmers Johnson:

Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire
The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic

Another recent book about the subject was “Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq” by Stephen Kinzer

If we bombed Hindus, stole their wealth, occupied their nation and installed puppet regimes – they would attack us too…after all they invented “suicide bombing”.

After Brit Hume asked, “If several shopping malls were attacked…”, Dr. Paul pointed out that Osama bin Laden is alive and well and living in nuclear armed Pakistan whom we send money to support, and that it is silly to ask about hypotheticals when things are left undone in the real world.

It seemed like he really wants to get bin Laden and bring him to justice while everyone else just wants to change the subject and bomb Iran? Is that sound foreign policy? Osama’s probably laughing his ass off watching the debates. Instead of really dealing with bin Laden, showing American resolve and justice, we let him go and bomb Iraq, bring Saddam in and let him be convicted in a kangaroo court and executed.

Ron Paul is the most researched candidate on the Internet:


Dr. Ron Paul For President 2008

Dr. Ron Paul (R-Texas)

There is no bigger supporter of the free market in Congress than Dr. Ron Paul (R-Texas). Nor is there a more fierce and unwavering opponent of war. This is not some political hack who looked at polls and decided to suddenly become pro-market and anti-war and bash the Bush administration’s policies so he can win some votes. He has always based his views and policies on principles. And his voting record proves it. He has also run for President in the past as a Libertarian Candidate (My preferred party).

Every day I see and hear intelligent people complain about the situation of this great country and when I ask them what they intend to do about it. They respond “The system’s broken, nothing you can do about it”. That is not true – it is wrong. Choosing to do nothing is only making it worse. Some people say “I’m not taking a position – I’m neutral” – that itself is a position against the status quo.

Dr. Paul is the Neoconservative’s worst nightmare. Look at his voting record:

Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

The media is censoring him right now. They do not want an anti-war candidate on the air who is much sounder on issues than Obama, Hillary, McCain, Giuliani or Romney. The media stance has been to ignore him. But for how long can you ignore a man who’s logic and views are the spirit of what makes America? They are the views of those who wrote the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence…the very document that inspired me to move to the USA and become an American.

Dr. Paul has always condemned the policy that subsidized Saddam Hussein, and the policy that waged war on Iraq and killed Saddam. The same is true of Noriega in Panama and the support and billions we gave to the “freedom fighters” in Afghanistan who later became the notorious Al-Qaeda and brought the Taliban to power. He has condemned and voted against the hundreds of billions of dollars we are spending for bombing countries that pose no threat to us. Is this why we are taxed so we can give weapons to Israel free and bomb Iraqis, Afghanis, and Iranians?

“Our experiment with foreign policy interventionism has failed, just as our experience with domestic economic interventionism has failed,” he said in 1982.

His latest book “A Foreign Policy of Freedom” is a 372-page manifesto, a collection of inspired statements to the House of Representatives that show him to be the most consistent and morally responsible politician, perhaps, in the whole of American history:

A Foreign Policy of Freedom

We do not want political prostitutes like Obama who supports “surgical missile strikes” against Iran or Hillary who has sold her soul to Israel and will put Israeli’s interests ahead of America’s. Nor do we want an authoritarian dictator like Giuliani (who was Mayor of New York City when I lived there) or warmongering McCain who sang “Bomb Iran” to the Beach Boy’s “Barbara Ann” tune on TV. Are these the best leaders fit to lead America? No.

I know of no other politician (except my friend, Maad Abu-Ghazaleh in the Bay Area) from any party who has the integrity, honesty and such an unwavering voting record on the issues that matter to us.

Don’t let him stand alone. Support him and his campaign, read about him, his views and spread to others, ask your radio, newspapers and TV stations to interview him on his views – He needs your support to get nominated:

Here’s a short video of Ron Paul and his responses during the Republican Debates on May 3, 2008: